The Son of the Empire

There is no place like home!

Preah Vihear temple part of Thailand: “Moronic” opinion from a reader of the Bangkok Post

leave a comment »

Wednesday January 30, 2008
SONGDEJ PRADITSMANONT
Bangkok
Bangkok Post Postbag
As a Khmer architecture junkie, I find Dr Reiff’s rationale somewhat presumptive in maintaining that since the Preah Vihear temple has Hindu elements, it therefore should belong to Cambodia (Postbag, Jan 29). There are many temples along the royal road from Angkor Wat to Phimai (such as Surin, Prachin Buri and Buri Ram) that have Hindu elements and Khmer style of architecture, and yet, indisputably they belong to the modern Siam (Thailand). Phnom Rung in Buri Ram, another potential World Heritage site with plenty of Khmer art, is definitely not claimable by Cambodia. The judgement of the Court of Justice in The Hague on the territory of Preah Vihear temple was only a legalistic interpretation and, with due respect to the court, all the Thai governments since the ruling date have accepted the decision.However, it is an indisputable fact that natural access to the Preah Vihear temple has to be made through Thai territory and hence physically it is difficult for visitors not to view the temple as being within Thai territory.In theory, the temple may belong to Cambodia, but in practice, the temple is part of Thailand.So it is rather ludicrous for Cambodia to ask the UN to recognise the temple as a World Heritage site without Thailand’s participation.

Written by Kolbot Khmer

February 17, 2008 at 8:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: